The manosphere has blessed the world with invaluable knowledge. I truly believe that there are men whose lives have been saved from total ruin, simply by following and understanding Red Pill basics.
However… this does not mean that there are not versions of Red Pill advertised that totally miss the mark. They aim to spread confusion rather than clarity, the same way modern media propagates establishment misinformation. Similarly to how social media campaigns are decided in small rooms from so-called “PR consultants”, so is your daily manosphere content decided by the same guys.
The main detection tool to distinguish gems from chuff is answering the following question: Is this advice aimed at increasing my agency? If it is not, it is usually there to confuse you. The founding block of the manosphere is precisely male agency.
Having said that, let us address some common myths that are thrown around nowdays.
The dating market is harder (Supply side)
No, no, and no. A million times no. The dating market, as a market in the economic sense, has never been better than it is today. Lower your Ego and rationally consider the following:
- Nearly every fertile young girl is unmarried – Never have been in the past. Young girls don’t leave the market (supply is maximal).
- The concentration of people in megacities has made search costs as low as possible. In terms of meeting girls, the modern male has potential never before imagined.
- Adding to the above, we have ease of travelling, instant communication, and if you are willing to go that route, dating apps.
Therefore, purely in terms of Supply, the market for hot, young women has never been better in the history of the human race. Girls never leave the market, are concentrated in one place, and it is easier to communicate with them.
You disagree? Speak with your grandfather. His village had 50 hot young girls, and by the time he was an adult, 30 of them had already been married. Compared to your ancestors, you are visiting a modern supermarket, while they had access to a raided convenience store.
However… you still want to protest, the market is doomed because of male competition… well let’s see.
The dating market is harder (Demand)
Well, you protest that males are taller than ever, richer than ever, and… more of them in pure numbers than ever. We have well documented 3rd world (primarily male) invasions to modern nations that make the average city a low value cockfest.
Well, it is true by purely mathematical and statistical accounts. The demand for sex from males matches and possibly exceeds the supply of girls. But you are forgetting the simple biological fact: Betas will always be Beta.
In the eyes of the girl, the Beta is an imp, a donkey, a beast of burden. And more importantly, an eunuch. There is a whole Red Pill literature supporting this with examples aplenty. In the eyes of the girl, the Beta male is a non-human. That is why they express contempt and unimaginable cruelty at them (have you seen divorce laws?).
Therefore, even if your city has a male-to-female ratio of 99:1, in reality, you are competing against other Alphas and Naturals. Betas will get the scraps regardless.
Don’t confuse pure numbers with real “volume” of competition. That competition is a Potemkin village. You always have been and always will be competing with relatively few other sex worthy men. And those men are always rare.
If you are not getting any sex, it is because you are in the wrong box, not due to competition.
So why is it so hard?
Have you seen the job market lately? Where the rallying cry of the whole industry is “over 100 applicants per job!”, you are not getting a job due to competition! Well… let me tell you, as the job argument is horseshit, so is the dating equivalent.
Let’s start with the job market. The reason you are not getting a job is because there are no jobs. Period. If there were jobs, those 100 applicants would be assigned to jobs, even if not immediately, maybe within a short period of time. But the reason they are not assigned into jobs, is because there are no jobs, not because there are 100 applicants.
Therefore, if your argument is that there is not enough sex to go around. It is because there is no sex happening. Not because there are more dicks in the modern world.
And now we arrive at the root cause of evil: not the market, not the supply of dicks, not the supply of pussy. Instead, simply that there is no sex happening in general. So why is there no sex happening:
- Atomization
- Feminism
- Anti-male laws
- Lifestyle of slavery (better put systematic suppression of agency)
The system isolates you, makes you overworked, and makes the women hysterical with fantasies of brutality and hatred. That is why there is no sex, because there are no connections between men and women being established. Because those connections are inherently becoming more and more impossible to establish, either via systemic pressure or ideological divergence.
But the mother of all causes is…
Sex is initiated from the erect phallus, not the pussy
If you are any familiar with Red Pill literature, it should be clear that eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap. Women don’t need sex as much as men do. Even genetically in humans this is supported: 14-30% of men reproduced vs 80% of women, ever.
Nature experiments and discards men like there is no tomorrow. If human male was a standalone species, it is facing the worst evolutionary pressure in the entire animal kingdom. Primarily induced by other humans, as homo sapiens himself is an apex predator.
The whole point is that if women are asked the question to fuck or not fuck, they won’t fuck. Therefore, when the male becomes passive, loses his entrepreneurial power to combine resources with his friends and make things work, then… only women are left to choose when sex happens, and the entire decision falls on their shoulders.
And as we already said, when women choose, they won’t fuck. They will just milk men for attention and resources (either directly or indirectly via the state).
I have seen (and had sex with) girls, that if you judged them by their behaviour, you would had said that they are complete sluts. They talk about dick, actively think about it, hit on men, etc. Well, even after clubbing with such women long term, do you know how many guys they fucked? … the best one was 2, over the course of a full year. And that was a girl who would be clubbing solo until 8am, after the rest of the group left.
Drill this into your head: sex needs male leadership. From meet, to escalation, to bedroom. Leave it to the girls, and no matter what they say, they won’t fuck – sex just won’t happen.
On the other hand, if males bonded, initiated festivals, parties, and showcased true male competence. The women would relax and be led into intimacy. The Dionysian orgies of antiquity are not what we see in modern clubs. Because ancient Greeks had what you don’t: manly agency and spirit. That is why the 4 reasons stated in the previous section sting so much. Because they take male agency away.
And with this out of the way, drill the following into your mind.
Women’s competition is not sexual
If you had a pussy, you would understand that you could sexually access any totem pole in a 100km vicinity. Even a 6 can jump a male 9 with very little effort. Hence, their competition is not sexual, it is not to grab men. They have undisputed free rein. Their competition is against other girls for a purely materialistic and pervertedly status seeking goal.
You protest and claim: that even then, women are sexually competing, but they do so for connection and relationship exclusivity. Bollox I say, because what is the purpose of a “relationship” than to parade the man in front of her friends and show them how good of a catch she got. She could very easily get emotional stability and safety nets from her own female social groups. She doesn’t need a man who barely understands what being a girl is.
All female competition exists for the simple reason of sticking it to other girls. Square and simple. It is not there to access high value men or resources. Take Korea, for example, the place with the most fierce female competition on planet earth: 1 out of 3 women has done facial surgery, and the spending for luxury and fashion is through the roof. If this is not “female competition”, I don’t know what it is.
So what are these girls competing for? Have you seen Korean men, and their pussified physique and mentality? Nearly all Korean girls I have dated have told me straight: Korean men are very kind and available, but so boring! [because they call me selfish in contrast].
Regardless, let’s give the benefit of the doubt and assume that there are hidden K-pop stars in the building corners that are monopolizing all sex. Girls, therefore, are competing for this hidden, angel face, Asian sex-ninja. The following numbers are from 2020, presumably better than now:
- Mean age of first sexual encounter: 22
- Percentage that had engaged in casual sex: 12% (up to 14% for a 95% Confidence Interval)
- Sexlessness in the past year: 43% of women and 36% of men reported no sex in 2020-2021
You can go on with these; we all know the situation is bad. But my point is, if the competition is so fierce, then where the hell is the sex! Where is the horny little Asian man?
Because that is the whole point, female competition is not about sex! The idea is smoke and mirrors. Female competition is about attention, which originates from pettiness to stick it to other girls. And if you take it too seriously, the whole society will end up going to shit.
